God designed, Nature endows, and hormones energize females to both withhold and provide sex in order to promote their self-interest. It:
- Energizes females to gain advantage, which
- Induces males to follow the female lead regarding sexual relations, which
- Motivates men to do whatever females require for men to have frequent and convenient access to sex, which
- Splatters smack dab on the feminists’ political platform that promotes masculine-style sexual freedom, which
- Encourages women to duplicate male behavior and especially the sexual, which
- Provides men with cheap and easy access to sex, which
- Enables men to ignore female hopes and dreams, which
- Encourages men to overlook womanly worth and pursue sex instead of a good woman or effective wife, which
- Makes men select wives for sex and hope they possess good wifely traits, which
- Informs women they can bypass promoting good wifely traits and provide sex in order to capture a boyfriend/husband, which
- Prompts women to compete with each other for boyfriends, lovers, and husbands, which
- Breeds distrust among females; makes them more insensitive, hard-hearted, and prone to be unhappy; and drives them to men for close friendships;** which
- Lowers female standards and expectations of men as husbands, which
- Enables girls and new generations to outcompete older sister females and further lower standards and expectations for sexual access, which
- Attracts men away from women their age and toward younger ones, which
- Intensifies female drive to have a boyfriend/husband, which
- Inspires women to copy masculine traits and techniques to elevate their status relative to men and outcompete sister females, which
- Makes females less attractive to men for anything other than sex, which
- Decreases the need for men to prove themselves worthy of women generally and one in particular, which
- Relieves men of competing with men for female favor, which
- Puts men in the role of competing directly with females for sex, which
- Returns the ball to the females’ court and loops this endless process back to the top for further concentration of human behaviors around sex and against the best interests of women and children.
The cultural values surrounding cheap and easy sex thus grind female hopes and dreams into the ground of society. Recourse seems to be for women to become more like men, follow them into the trenches of work and war, and fabricate hopes and dreams that compensate for bypassing primal female urges.
Tomorrow, we’ll see the loop that better fulfills NATURAL female hopes and dreams.
**This bullet is germane and fits perfectly. It was inspired by Her Highness Violet and added a day after the rest of the post.
I’ve ALWAYS thought that radical feminists will create POLYGAMY–when that happens, marriage to one woman may never return
“Prompts women to compete with each other for boyfriends, lovers, and husbands……”
I think this sums up the main problem facing women and society…
When we started competing with each other we stopped trusting each other, and then we looked to men to replace the influence of good female friendships. When that didn’t work (as it doesn’t in the vast majority of cases), the women harden their hearts and become even more competitive, judgy, insensitive, entitled, and unhappy.
It is my firm belief that women NEED other women for love, support, and encouragement. We might be able to get by without it but we are not better for it.
Your Exceptionalness Violet,
A highly significant contribution stated clearly and well. Thanks. I inserted your thoughts into the post above.
Guy
“Prompts women to compete with each other for boyfriends, lovers, and husbands……”
and now, even teens get violent against a “competitive” pregnant girl for no reason while adult bystanders do nothing… welcome to the 21st century america you have created, “ladies.”
http://abcnews.go.com/US/pregnant-teen-attacked-packed-seattle-bus/story?id=12414910&tqkw=&tqshow=
Can you help me understand this- Mr Guy?
My husband was telling me that he had the hots for Sarah Palin. I said “I know she is attractive but she is very masculine in her behavior…why would you like that?” He said “She might be masculine but she isn’t more masculine than me… and I don’t like girls who are too girly”. (I don’t really know how to take that because I am pretty girly- lol).
If opposites attract why would my masculine alpha-male husband be attracted to a masculine alpha-male woman? Or is he only attracted to her sexually and wouldn’t be interested in her for marriage?
Your Gorgeousness Violet,
I can’t explain it, but you might find reassurances somewhere within these considerations:
• As men get older their testosterone-to-estrogen ratio declines, which makes them less aggressive. It could mean more aggressive women are not the ‘turnoffs’ they may have been previously.
• He says, “she isn’t more masculine to me.” He talks about her looks, where you cite her behavior. Public behavior has little to do with a man’s view of a woman’s sexual attractiveness.
• By today’s standards and context, she’s not that masculine in behavior. Remember too, Todd’s an outdoorsman in sports and business. Spending time with him earlier would have required a lot of outdoor time, which in Alaska means masculine-type behavior does it not? She helped on his fishing boat. Still, she seems attractively feminine or femininely attractive to me.
• Claiming the ‘hots’ may be his way of teasing you. It depends on whether he or you opened the subject. Only you can tell. You can call it bad taste, but you will gain nothing.
• Sexually attracted, yes. I doubt the thought of marriage to her even entered his head.
• As to the ‘girly’ comment, you challenged him with “why would you like that?” To come out on top, he disclaimed liking ‘too girly’. That’s natural male dominance shining through.
I suggest finding some ways to laugh about it and drop the subject, if his interest has not already faded.
Guy
Thanks, Sir Guy.
I was never offended. I don’t mind if he has the “hots” for her. It isn’t like I have never found a male tv personality to be highly attractive.
I was mostly just curious and trying to understand the male mind better.
Your Uniqueness Violet,
I admire your maturity. It’s a powerful ingredient for harmonizing a marriage.
Guy
I have close female friendships, and had high standards for my husband. He rose to meet those standards even though we had sex before marriage. Maybe men get married for reasons other than sex? If it was just sex then no one would get married ever. Sex has always been available without marriage.
yes, sex has always been available without marriage. but never more available and accepted by society, and women, than today.
are we then, arguably the greatest country ever founded—wait for it……..because of our values and moral foundations—better as a result?
have hyper-competitive females, rooted in misogyny (wiki: “though most common in men, misogyny also exists in and is practiced by women against other women or even themselves.”) really made our great country better as a whole? or have they really just attempted to make themselves feel better?
and innocent girls at unheard of ages are now shown 24/7 that their supposed value to men is merely sexual… encouraged and exploited by our once great society…. who’s REALLY responsible? men for taking what they can get… or women for allowing, even enabling it, to happen?
“The results from this report show Tinseltown’s eagerness to not only objectify and fetishize young girls, but to sexualize them in such a way that real teens are led to believe their sole value comes from their sexuality,” said PTC President Tim Winter. “This report is less about the shocking numbers that detail the sickness of early sexualization in our entertainment culture and more about the generation of young girls who are being told how society expects them to behave.”
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/12/16/new-study-shows-images-sexualized-teen-girls-dominating-airwaves/?test=faces