A lady committed a cardinal sin for this blog. She distorted and rephrased what I said and used it to preach a political sermon. In short, she was caught in political sin. Her comment was deleted and blog forgiveness isn’t likely forthcoming.
As if I had said it, she spouted feminist drivel. Using what I never said as the theme, she dishonestly claimed as truth that which directly uplifts women while indirectly demeaning men. It’s a popular propaganda tool used by the political Left, but it has no place here.
Here’s the truism she twisted to her advantage: “Men do whatever women require in order for men to have frequent and convenient access to sex.”
Here’s how she distorted the thought, reshaped the meaning, and commenced her rant: “I have to say, if it is indeed an absolute truth that men marry for the sole purpose of securing “frequent and unlimited access to sex, then I don’t want to get married. That, to me, sounds like legalized prostitution. A women exchanges sex-on-tap for provider/protector? …” She continued for nearly a hundred more words.
Ladies, in case you wonder, trickery more than attitude and twisting my words more than demeaning men got her expelled from this school. I don’t exclude politics from the blog.