1763. Sex Difference Redux — Part 17: Virginity


Two kinds of virginity exist—actual and virtual. The virtual makes a woman powerfully influential as described in the series ‘virtual virginity’. The actual is only attractive to men, but its apparent presence bribes the male nature far beyond its intrinsic worth. Once she yields, it’s meaningless although virtual virginity can restore even greater value to her.

First, the male nature. To fully understand the role of female virginity to males, we need to dispose of the fantasy that male virginity has value to females, except perhaps to the female ego disillusioned by ‘equality politics’. Women deceive themselves by placing high value on male virginity. It’s probably another attempt to bridge this gap. That is, if female virginity is important to men, why shouldn’t male virginity be important to women?

When it comes to sexual relations, men are hunter-conquerors, and boys are little men. To a boy after puberty, his virgin status is a shame, a horse collar label among his peers. If not laughing in his face, they laugh behind his back. It has to do with masculinity and male competition, not girls.

To the girl who is surprised or who ‘nurtures’ a boy through his change of status, three outcomes are most likely. (1) Too much foreplay and he pre-ejacs, embarrasses himself, holds it against her, and longs for the day he can prove himself to another female. So, she’s made herself temporary in his life. (2) Too little foreplay and she’s not ready. Yet, she yields and he learns that girls are easy to rollover, foreplay is not so important, and he longs for the day he can do it again. So, he shifts his focus from her to others and takes early steps toward seeing reward in infidelity. (3) Having many successful sexual encounters teaches boys that adventurous thrills can be found in multiple partners and that one female can be dull. Unless they just married, boys have little future use for the girl who taps their virginity. This makes it a ‘dirty job’ for smart girls and women.

Doubts exist whether a boy could learn such negative lessons about girls from one event. But, many sexual episodes program the mind, especially when they happen in the hormonal throes that program the male heart during puberty and shortly thereafter.

So much for men; their virgin status may be beneficial for their wives. But male virginity has nowhere near the same importance as both actual and virtual female virginity to women.

A bride’s virginity adds greatly to her sense of self-importance; she accomplished her goal of preserving her greatest asset, unsullied as it were. Her actual virginity contributes markedly to bridegroom’s sense of self-admiration. His male competitors highly value female virginity as critical to a man’s competitive stature. He’s second class if he marries a woman other men have known. Even if others don’t think it, the bridegroom does. Men who marry virgins think very highly of themselves; their self-image takes on a proud aura they don’t talk about, which further inflates their self-image. (Remember, this is not about modern day custom but their intrinsic natures.)

This sums it up. Actual virginity has value to men but her yielding ends it. Virtual virginity has value to women if they use rather than cheapen it. In both cases, women are in charge. Female behavior determines social outcomes. As women go, so goes society.

— — — — —

NOTE: I describe it elsewhere but can’t find it now. One simple strategy delivers the greatest long term benefits to women: She should never reveal whether virgin or not before marriage and never disclose her sexual history before or after marriage. The series ‘virtual virginity’ describes reasons and techniques to implement the strategy.

About these ads

9 Comments

Filed under sex differences

9 Responses to 1763. Sex Difference Redux — Part 17: Virginity

  1. This may have been touched on somehwere in this blog: But isn’t it considered a weakness for people to base their sense of self so heavily upon what others/peers think of us? It seems that with men, when it comes to not being humiliated by other men, this is an acceptable place for this type of mental “weakness”- So should women be compassionate about this fact rather than demanding that men “show true strenght of charachter and not care what anybody thinks” because God knows women have the same issue when it comes to our looks. I suppose it all comes down to what matters more to a person what others/peers think of them and WHAT THEY THINK OF THEMSELVES, but it seems that for men, the two are inseperable. Is there truly a place in the human heart that is only influenced by its owner and none else? Of is the idea just folly and we all all slaves at some level to others opinions, and should just accpet it.

  2. Anon...

    Could ‘male virginity’ go up in value~simply because any man who ejaculates could be a father? Im hearing a lot about how some men could have more than one kid by more than one woman; having babies less than 5 years apart: this is all ethnicities BTW: and condoms arent foolproof, they just slow down the inevitable. Besides why should a man care what other men think..THATS NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS…only the business of him & his bride and the family THEY make together

  3. Anon...

    Oh and many guys who do this nonsense, having more than one kid by more than one woman, have ZERO SKILLS or TRADE.. So its up to the taxpayers to care for these children. When i said all colors of men do this, its because black men have the reputation BUT i know a few whites PERSONALLY who are like this as well~

  4. Shermy

    Who are these adolescent males supposed to lose their virginity to if we’re teaching the girls to wait until marriage?

    Your Highness Shermy,

    Not to worry. Boys will find ways. Some girls won’t believe the wisdom passed to them and boys already have experience passing girls around. Don’t they? Also, prostitutes have been around awhile. (Now, don’t jump my case that I’m endorsing prostitution, ’cause I’m not. They are, however, a fact of life and boys do have money.)

    You seem to indirectly argue that girls shouldn’t wait. Do you really think that girls should give up their best interests to satisfy the desire of boys who eventually lose interest in girls they conquer?

    Guy

    • Shermy

      I suppose my concern is what we’re teaching the boys. I know that’s not the aim of this blog, but it’s a huge part of the problem I see with the disrespect the society has for sex. My other concern is not acknowledging the fact that young women also experience the same hormonal responses as the boys do, and yet we’re telling them to deal with it in a completely different way and leaving them susceptible to having no understanding of their bodies and then expecting them to be able to sexually satisfy their husbands later in life. There seems to be a disconnect there.
      ——————————-
      Your Highness Shermy,

      I BROKE DOWN YOUR COMMENT AND RESPOND IN CAPS to your questions in lower case.

      I suppose my concern is what we’re teaching the boys. YOU DON’T HAVE TO TEACH BOYS VERY MUCH ABOUT SEX. THEY WON’T LISTEN OR HEAR MUCH ANYWAY. DAD-TALK ABOUT LOVE AND RESPECT OR BOY-TALK ABOUT GIRLS IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT. A BETTER ALTERNATIVE IS TO RESPECT BOYS AS ADULTS-IN-MINIATURE AND MORE MATURELY THAN THEY ACTUALLY DESERVE. DO ALL THAT IN ORDER TO AID DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR SELF-RESPECT AND MAKE THEM SUSCEPTIBLE TO LEARNING TO RESPECT OTHERS. IF THEY’RE TAUGHT TO RESPECT OTHERS, THEY WILL LEARN ALL BY THEMSELVES HOW FEMALE UNIQUENESS DESERVES SPECIAL ATTENTION AND IN SPECIAL CASES, CHERISHMENT. PARENTAL PREACHING IS AS BAD AS PARENTAL SILENCE.

      I know that’s not the aim of this blog, OF COURSE IT IS AND MANY ARTICLES DESCRIBE IT (EXAMPLES: “MOTHERING SONS” IN CONTENTS PAGE.)

      but it’s a huge part of the problem I see with the disrespect the society has for sex. NOT DISRESPECT FOR SEX BUT DISRESPECT FOR EACH OTHER BECAUSE OF FEMALE MISTAKES, MISUSES, AND MISPERCEPTIONS OF SEX.

      My other concern is not acknowledging the fact that young women also experience the same hormonal responses as the boys do, SO WHAT?
      and yet we’re telling them to deal with it in a completely different way OF COURSE, THEY AREN’T BOYS. THEIR DIFFERENCES SHOULD BE ELEVATED INTO DREAMS FOR BOYS—THINK OF MODESTY, CHASTITY, MONOGAMY, RESPECT AS PERSON MUCH STRONGER THAN RESPECT AS FEMALE.

      and leaving them susceptible to having no understanding of their bodies I DON’T BELIEVE THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND THEIR BODIES ALTHOUGH I CAN BELIEVE THEY WANT TO KNOW HOW THEY WILL BE IN BED. GIRL-TALK IS AS INFLUENTIAL AND PROBABLY MORE ACCURATE THAN BOY-TALK.

      and then expecting them to be able to sexually satisfy their husbands later in life. WHY WOULD A MOTHER FEEL COMPELLED TO MAKE SATISFYING HER DAUGHER’S HUSBAND ANY OF MOM’S BUSINESS? HUSBANDS EXPECT TO TEACH THEIR WIVES TO ENJOY SEX BY HIS PROVIDING IT. IF SHE INITIATES, SHOWS HOW, OR OTHERWISE DISPLAYS EXPERIENCE IN BED, SHE LOSES SOME OF HIS RESPECT. QUITE OFTEN IT ENDS IN DIVORCE WITH THE REAL REASON NEVER LEARNED.

      There seems to be a disconnect there. I THINK THE DISCONNECT IS IN YOUR NOT YET HAVING THOUGHT IT ALL THROUGH.

      MANY HAPPY RETURNS,
      GUY

  5. Anon...

    Yea.ive heard the prostitute story BUT ive also heard from older men that the boy needs to be able to take care of HIMSELF first; meaning have a trade or skill so they are a REAL MAN before he goes with one; or else hes RUINED for family life…these were non Christian men who said this years ago ~~~stay a virgin until you get a marketable skill~~

    Your Highness Anon…,
    I’ve not heard that until now. Thanks. It’s true but I’m not sure that “he’s RUINED for family life” is as severe as that. Chaste girls in his adolescence can improve on his shortcomings.
    Guy

  6. Girl

    What about this?

    But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband. 1 Corinthians 7:2

    Your Highness Girl,
    I don’t understand the question. I’ve not violated the Holy Bible, or perhaps you think I have. Please expand your questioning.
    Guy

    • Girl

      I see an incongruity between what is reality (in Nature) and what that scripture implies – which is that fornication (premarital sex) is a sin, not just for women, but for men also. The incongruity (with that scripture) is what is pointed out about the actual Nature of males in your post – the need to “sow their wild oats” as the expression goes. If it is “God’s will” that women wait for marriage, and every woman on earth actually followed “God’s will,” then logically, it would also have to be “God’s will” that every man do the same, for there would be no one for him to “sow wild oats” with. I have “God’s will” in quotes, not quoting you, as you did not use this phrase in your post, but rather because religion seems to be a general undercurrent within these discussions and others like them elsewhere online, in books, etc.

      Your Highness Girl,
      The male nature I write about is presumed to precede religious beliefs and life’s experiences. God’s will isn’t a commandment; it’s an entitlement. So, it guides as a religious belief rather than shapes the male nature. Otherwise you logic is good.
      Guy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s