236. Female malpractice — Part 7

♣ She assertively initiates unmarried sex—will she be led to church or left in the lurch? Odds favor the latter.

♣ New mothers that have no husband to love them indulge their children in hope mom will be more deeply appreciated. 

♣ She wears her heart on her sleeve, just to be sure he understands her—mystique or mistake? Probably the latter.

♣ She goes for one-night stands and bitches when he doesn’t call. Who’s at fault? The giver or the taker?

♣ Girls providing fellatio in public add dignity to the female gender. Right?

♣ Young women join adolescent men in raucously and raunchly applauding women stripping, pole dancing, using dildos. Debase your own gender and expect manly respect for anything but sex? Reflect badly on the gender? 

♣ She gets in his face loudly to win an argument. Is she attractive to keep around or just another guy to ignore?

♣ A woman kisses a frog into princehood. They marry. Then, she neuters him with words that wound his spirit for any kind of life with her. Then she can’t stand him, because he becomes more like what she calls him. Also, he can’t stand himself being with her.

[More about female malpractice appears in posts 221, 206, 189, 175, 164, and 150. Scroll down or search for the number with a dot and space following it.]

234. Female Fortitude — 51 through 55

These ‘fortitudinals’ provide special themes or summaries. Numbers match the posts.

51.            A man’s natural pursuit of other females does not stop until one woman so captures his respect and captivates his imagination that he devotes himself to her alone. What’s her best strategy for winning this battle of the sexes?

52.            It’s a boob paradox. Women publicly appeal directly to the sexual interests of men. They capture men for sex, but they can’t hold one for long after infatuation, romantic love, and lust fade in a year or two.

53.            Men call romance whatever is required to initiate foreplay or sex. Women know romance as the special attention he pays her when sex is not at stake.

54.            She marries expecting him to change, but he doesn’t. He marries expecting her not to change, but she does. Both get what they don’t want.

55.            In her recent book, Female Chauvinist Pigs—Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture, Ariel Levy describes the latest in extreme female behavior. They do man-things to demo female value. (Post 226 also addresses the subject.)

[Previous ‘fortitudinals’ appear in posts 228, 213, 203, 199, 186, 182, and 176.]

221. Female malpractice — Part 6

♀ ♣ First impressions are lasting ones. First dates plant the seeds of everything from no calls to marriage. Women intuitively sense this but not how to deal with it to their advantage.  

♀ ♣ Both sexes tend to marry people like their mothers. But women take it too far. They mother their man and wilt on the vine of his resentment.

♀ ♣ If she’s after fun and excitement on first date, she’s planting seeds for anything and everything except marriage.  

♀ ♣ Trying ever harder to succeed with men, females turn sex into adventurism and free-brothel convenience strictly for males. Booty calls, public fellatio, and groupies come to mind.      

♀ ♣ Men hang with guys but date women. When women turn themselves into booty, men let them hang out too. (One Duke University senior claimed she never had a date in college and knew no one that had. Plenty of sex, but no dates? Man’s game or woman’s?)

NOTE: To see what women become hanging out with guys, try Ariel Levy’s book, Female Chauvinist Pigs — Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture.

[More about female malpractice appears in posts 206, 189, 175, 164, and 150. Scroll down or search for the number with a dot and space following it.]

194. Female dominance—Gone! —Part 4

Our mothers were right. We become like those with whom we associate. This includes the music we choose.

From rock to rap, the pop music industry is the enemy of females. Or, it should be. It’s male-created, male-centered, male-dominated.

·        Mission—Make money by exploiting sex.

·        Strategy—Promote greater sexual freedom.  

·        Tactic—Personalize sex for the fan. Excite female senses with rhythm, lyrics, visuals, scents, mosh pits.

·        Tactic—Promote sexual adventurism to lower moral standards, e.g., promote eroticism.

·        Tactic—Popularize deviancy to lower norms of behavior, e.g., induce public fellatio. (Note that males retain self-respect. They don’t stoop to public cunnilingus.)

·        Tactic—Break down female inhibitions with name-calling. Mock feminine values, demean females, belittle their hopes and dreams.

Females abandon their natural feminine power. They accept and help popularize this enemy to their gender. This leads directly to more dumpees, exes, rape victims, battered women, unrequited love, girls gone wild, female chauvinist pigs. The future looks worse, as prepubescent girls sashay in erotic get up even in church.

Instead of fighting back, females become more like guys—in thought, emotions, and behavior. They assimilate with their conquerors and lose their gender identity. New generations deepen this crossover.

Females associate with the testosterone-driven pop culture and become like those in it—just as our mothers predicted.

[More about the disappearance of female dominance appears in posts 173, 159, and 151. Scroll down or search by the number with dot and space following it.]

 

  

 

121. Her sexual history?—Part 03

Her sexual history disclosed to a man earns or lowers his respect. In general, closeness to virginity earns respect. Promiscuity detracts.  

A man wants to know what men preceded him sexually in his woman’s life—if he’s going to devote himself to her. Several reasons prompt his curiosity. Several outcomes hinge on the revelations.

It’s not the ‘used’ and unused issue. That’s how he hides his agenda. It’s those other guys. When? How recent? Who? Do I know them? Will I meet them? Will they return to her? Were my family or friends involved? Will she turn back to them? What emotional attachments remain?

Why’d she do it? Marriage? Lover? Love? Shack up? Just sex? One-night stand? Raped? Or, perhaps, just to seal a friendship? (See post #55, Raunch, about that latest trend.)

What other baggage does she bring to their relationship in terms of men he will be facing with her? Will a former sexual partnership continue if he commits to her? Of course feminists think it shouldn’t matter, but it does.  

Just knowing his woman’s sexual history lowers her value to him. If he follows well-respected men, she gets no credit. If he follows disrespected or disreputable exes, her worth plummets. Of course it’s not fair, but men judge their woman by the men who have had her..

 

85. RAUNCH II

Young women compete more and more with males to do what men do. For example, they took up cigar smoking a few years ago. Seeing their older sisters unsuccessful at outdoing men in the males’ game, the next generation tries harder and always with something new.

In her recent book, Female Chauvinist Pigs—Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture, Ariel Levy describes the leading edge of post-modern feminist behavior. To be more like men, women have to enjoy looking at naked females.

So, they try to outdo men at being entertained by erotic female behavior. They applaud, hoot, and holler as other females pole dance, strip, and otherwise entertain men.

Their retro thinking has moved young women backwards in maturity to mimicking teen boys. It generates lots of sex and extra disrespect for the uniqueness of female judgments.

[Initial RAUNCH is at post #55.]

55. RAUNCH

In her recent book, Female Chauvinist Pigs—Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture, Ariel Levy describes the latest in extreme female behavior. Young women ‘seal’ their friendship with men friends by providing sex. Such behavior disqualifies them for a stable marriage, because their fiancé or husband would have too many unanswerable questions.

Does she expect to keep sealed friends once she commits to a man? Can and will she dump them for him? Or, is he expected to welcome them as her other friends? How big is her need for male friends?

Since sex bonds women, how intensely was her bonding with her friend or friends? Can she escape or just toss her bonds away?

Does ‘sealing’ mean only once? Do the friends expect more? Can she resist or even want to? Can they?

Does she really expect to screw a friend once, call it quits, and expect him to honor her expectations?

How many friends did she seal? Will she continue the practice after marriage? What about new friends? Both theirs and hers that she may make at her job or elsewhere.

How deep or broad are the friendships she sealed or seals? Any emotional connections beyond friendship? Does friendship have the same meaning for her as for him?

Who is a friend? Anyone close to him? His buddies? Have they been sealed? Which ones?

Will she seal their newly developed friends too? Can she call them friends without doing so?

What does he think about it? How does he accept her old friends? Can he befriend her friends if he doesn’t know? What if he does know? How does she expect him to handle it—as if it never happened?

What about his old friends that become friends with her? Does she feel an obligation with them too? If they know that she sealed with others, won’t they expect the same? Won’t that adversely affect their family of friends?

What about her friends that she did not seal with? What are their reactions? Friendlier or unfriendlier?

When he encounters her friends, he will suspect whether he knows she sealed or not. Won’t he, in effect, feel cuckolded or at least suspect it upon encountering her every male friend?

Did they do it before or after our marriage? If she sealed once, she’s always suspect. Friends and acquaintances come in all colors and shades. How can he know? Tell the difference? Trusting her is not possible.

How can she be believed as faithful, when she parts with sex for less than love but to strengthen or solidify a continuing friendship? Isn’t sealing the essence of casual sex and disdain for the man she might want to marry?

Can he seal with his female friends? Is he free to roam among friends to explore what’s available? How about his developing new female friends? Can he seal too. Old female friends?

Where does it end? Not likely in a lasting relationship.   

45. No Sex without Marriage

America’s traditional female strategy of No Sex without Marriage has been laughed, politicized, and propagandized out of existence, much to the benefit and delight of all males after puberty. Adopting masculine-style sexual freedom that stretches into porn and raunch, women claim rights that are more political than natural or sensible.

Having the right to do it doesn’t mean it’s right to do it. What’s right politically weakens civil and threatens domestic life. Too much casual and easy sex outside the home poisons relationships, damages home life, shatters families, and infects children with poor examples that worsen the next generation.   

Women engaged in promoting their newfound sexual freedom ignore or cannot recognize the poisonous effects on men. Unfortunately, the majority of women soft-headedly follow suit.

Women talk only to women about their sexual freedom. Men are left out, except the feminized ones that join in as political correctioneers. Women and now girls compensate males with open legs, and so men and boys eagerly go along for the ride. So many trophies, so little time.

Men pride themselves in not changing to please others, and they especially reject changing to meet a woman’s expectations. One window remains open, however. A man will respond favorably to a woman’s expectations and pressures for him to change prior to his conquest of her—but his willingness stops afterward.

Our foremothers used No Sex without Marriage to change our forefathers’ values, thinking, and habits to be both acceptable to marry and more valuable as husband and father. They shaped their marital future by conveying in a sex-free courtship just what they expected as wife and mother. They didn’t push our forefathers to change, they drew their man toward change with charm and indirectness. Our forefathers adopted the female-friendly values and standards expected of them.

After marriage she did not have to change him. But that’s all changed now.

Modern women abandoned No Sex without Marriage. Consequently, their window to change a man to meet female expectations and standards closes after a date or few. That’s not enough time.

As a result, modern wives try to change husband to meet female expectations. The more a man resists, the more his woman pushes. The greater his resistance, the greater her frustration. Her mothering and nurturing nature arise, and before long she treats him as a child or as insignificant.

The process injects interpersonal toxins that make women outside the home more alluring to him and tend to make her disposable in a few years if not sooner.

Our foremothers worked to perfect a workable strategy for keeping a man. Modern women adopt a right that drives men toward other women.

Women fear abandonment and seek affection. With uncrossed legs before marriage they strengthen the chance of the former and weaken chances for the latter.