As we recognize love, it all originates in the heart of individual females; it’s a derivative of inborn self-love plus the primal motivation to spread love to others. A female’s motivation comes from this psychological and physiological fact, she loves herself for sharing her love with others. Spread discreetly and wisely to those nearby, her love also produces what she needs and wants out of life.
If women expect to be loved more or better, they have to first pump some more into the world around them. How many who complain about men and children today are doing that?
Men have nothing comparable to female love. The key to the male nature is respect. He’s born lacking in self-love but loaded with self-respect, but unlike women who willingly like to share, males give their respect to the extent that it’s earned.
Before Christ’s ministry, love had little impact on ancient world events and was, therefore, not very effective in promoting the interests of females. Christ legitimized love as the main theme of life on earth, and women learned to take advantage.
Western civilization developed on the back of Christianity and the endorsement and spread of love by women. Mothers taught their boys why and how to love, girls how to love better. It accelerated development of Western civilization, promoted our American spirit of individual freedom, and was backdrop in the eventual founding of our unique constitutional republic.
I can’t resist editorializing, but you should receive this heads-up.
Both Christianity and Western civilization are under attack by huge anti-Christian and anti-American political movements. You don’t see much of it except in results that degrade the American culture. The media keeps it well hidden from the public. Future generations of women will find their love much less effective at producing what they need and want. Politicians claim women will be more powerful even than men, but does that match the interests of women? Individuals don’t get to decide; others decide for them.
If everyone becomes part of a political class, a hierarchy automatically develops (already operating). Where would you expect to be? In the upper 20% ruling class? Or the bottom 20% ruled class? Is one better than the other, or will you be told that all are equal?
Without Christ’s love as standard, what will love be like? Become? It will evolve into what? More blame and class hatred? Without Christ’s love to help females soften the male nature, how else can women not be fully dominated and mistreated?
Feminists think they have a solution. In future generations, men will be different. Wherever they can impose themselves in elementary education, feminists and racial activists are now indoctrinating boys to be different personality-wise. In a major educational movement, school children are already being taught about the evils of white male privilege, blamed for racism, and justified by blaming those long gone.
Little boys blamed for things in which they had no responsibility, because they will always be innocent by virtue of birth and sex. Of course, it’s all political to gain power over the public on behalf of leftist activists.
Teachers now indoctrinate little white boys into a less aggressive and more compassionate female-like personality, and to fill by design a more passive role in society. Is that what women need? Men acting as low-initiative little men to do female bidding? Think about it! Will future women be ready to run their lives without the help of a mate of their own color?
Last time I looked, women don’t marry wimps, but that’s what feminists and racial activists are indoctrinating via the education system. White wimps apply social pressure for white women to marry color, and thus let whites die off for lack of white men’s ability to replace themselves. A global but colorful rearrangement of power.
For the gals living today, the effects will come too late. You still have to interact with men who have been propagandized into being blamed and becoming disrespectful of women, not yet delicately brainwashed into being feminized men to fit political purpose.